My portfolios have been gradually pivoting towards equities in recent months and away from a more defensive positioning – a positioning that has compensated somewhat for discounts having widened significantly during the past couple of years.
Given poor market sentiment and the fact humility is an essential component of good portfolio management, it is worth re-examining the case for equities at this juncture – particularly so given we are approaching the moment of peak interest rates. In doing so, investors are encouraged to focus on company fundamentals rather than economic or market forecasts – given the former is real and the latter are invariably wrong.
Read more on why John Baron is backing stocks
Investment trust discounts are about to turn a corner
Why I'm buying equity investment trusts
Forecasting folly
Regular readers will know of my dislike of forecasting. JK Galbraith, the renowned Canadian American economist, once said: “The only function of economic forecasting is to make astrology look respectable.” Although well known, this prescient insight is usually ignored and undue importance is attributed to forecasts by various economic, financial and government organisations – even though a cursory glance at their track records usually leaves little doubt as to their worth. Yet, largely because of the ‘importance’ of those making and quoting these forecasts, this folly is accepted, quoted by media outlets, and therefore often casts a long shadow – as is currently the case with financial markets.
The lessons of the past year or so should be sobering. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) led the way last year on behalf of the majority of its peer group in forecasting economic recession. As recently as the spring, their strategists were more bearish than since the financial crisis of 2008-09. Yet now the organisation has turned on a sixpence and raised its global growth forecast to 3 per cent for next year. Talk of recession has vanished into thin air as though it never happened. Indeed, 25 of the IMF’s past 28 UK growth forecasts have been too low – until only recently, it was forecasting that the UK would be one of the few European countries to go into recession – and yet look how events have transpired.
This folly is also evident at home. The Office for Budgetary Responsibility (OBR) is not having a good time. It has had to significantly reduce its forecast for public sector net borrowing on a number of occasions – recently, net borrowing turned out to be a huge £100bn below the OBR’s forecast as recently as in the spring of 2021. Meanwhile, inflation forecasts have been wide of the mark, with recent year-end forecasts of 2.9 per cent, especially as inflation is set to remain ‘stickier’ and more volatile for reasons covered in previous columns. Little wonder a recent annual assessment of 30 economic forecasts compiled by David Smith of The Sunday Times showed the OBR came third from bottom.
This brings us to the woeful record of the Bank of England (BoE). In the autumn of last year, it predicted a harsh and protracted recession with a 3 per cent fall in gross domestic product (GDP). Its record on inflation is no better, having been long behind the curve. The defence that it cannot be expected to account for external shocks simply does not wash given the period before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the biggest ‘shock’ of all, saw inflation rising steeply and reaching 6.1 per cent the month before – and yet interest rates were still at 0.5 per cent, woefully below what was needed to achieve its objective of 2 per cent inflation. A fundamental review has since been announced by the BoE.
The large institutions are not alone. In the summer of last year, chief executives of large international investment houses joined the chorus in predicting an economic hurricane, recession and worse. And this folly continues. News that the UK has joined the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), which will eliminate tariffs with some of the world’s fastest-growing economies, drew yawns and predictions of only minimal benefit – but how can forecasters factor in the huge potential? Better not to make predictions at all. Instead, the lesson is to focus on company fundamentals relative to sentiment, and not the myriad of forecasts that shift with the sand, while recognising the occasional significant changes in the investment landscape.
The reality is dawning
And whisper it gently amid the noise, but reality is yet again proving the consensus forecasts wrong. Economies have not slipped into recession. Budget deficits and finances generally are better than expected. Company results have not plunged into the abyss. Corporate finances are in good shape and defaults remain low. Bond yields have not risen as far as confidently predicted. And stock markets have rallied and made steady progress. While inflation is high, and will remain stickier than hitherto, it will fall further in the short term as one-off variables fall away. We may indeed soon be approaching the moment interest rates are higher than inflation. This is the economic reality.
And the market is certainly sensing it. It is climbing the wall of worry. Corporate earnings have been resilient because companies saw the problems ahead and tightened their belts by reducing their costs and borrowing. This protected margins and profits – as is part evidenced by the spread between corporate and government bond yields widening only fractionally. Little wonder the US market has been pleasantly surprised by strong earnings, which have been helped by robust sales and lower energy prices. Those concerned about the narrowness of the market’s rise – being led by the big tech companies – should perhaps take comfort from the 2019-21 rally, which saw it broaden out once it was evident the economy was improving.
And economies are moving along. In large part, the litmus test as to how well an economy is doing is the unemployment rate. Levels both in the UK and US compare favourably – with UK employment being at a record high – and globally they are not out of kilter. Meanwhile, ironically, the forecasting folly has conditioned markets to bad news. And with money supply growth now negative and budget deficits retreating, the impact of higher interest rates (as evidenced by lead indicators such as the housing market faltering) suggest the peak is near – which could well be a catalyst for markets.
In short, there will always be risks in investment. But now is a good time to be investing, as it becomes increasingly evident the risks are falling away. Do not wait for the forecasters to suggest it is, because by then it will probably be too late – and perhaps even time to sell. As ever, it will always be prudent to retain some firepower via more defensive assets given volatility will be the usual travelling companion on such a journey. However, while timing is important, it is usually better to be a little too early than too late – markets can move rapidly when sentiment shifts.
Recent columns have pointed to the equity preferences of the 10 real investment trust portfolios managed in real time on the website www.johnbaronportfolios.co.uk, including the two covered by this monthly column, as they gradually pivot accordingly. This has centred on the UK market and private equity. However, exposure has also been increased to other markets, and below are a few of those companies that have been added to the portfolios.
Portfolio additions
Pershing Square Holdings (PSH) is something of a special situation. A very high-conviction portfolio focused on the US market, a proactive engagement policy with the management of those businesses in the portfolio, a conventional yet forensic investment approach allied to concurrent hedging strategies, together with managers and a team with a significant stake in the company, are an unusual mix. This unconventionality may be deterring investors, but therein lies the opportunity. Recent figures have shown the company is ranked first out of around 140 North American funds by a wide margin. Meanwhile, the company stands on a near-35 per cent discount to net asset value (NAV), which the management is being proactive to correct.
CC Japan Income & Growth (CCJI) seeks both dividend income and capital growth through investment in mostly larger-sized equities, although up to 10 per cent of the portfolio can be held in unlisted or private businesses. The management consists of a strong team with long experience of the market, and one that has a very good track record against its benchmark over one, three and five years (and since inception) – the company again topping its peer group over each of these time frames. The current 3.1 per cent yield is not overly generous by international standards but conceals the potential for strong dividend growth given the underutilised balance sheet strength of the company’s holdings.
Japan has disappointed in the past, but the market backdrop is improving. More activist shareholders and the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s recent threat to delist by 2026 those companies that continue to trade on a price/book value of less than one (representing around half of all companies in Japan, much higher than in other markets) are in part possible catalysts for continued market strength. Meanwhile, the growing presence of domestic investors should maintain managements’ focus on the importance of dividends. The Corporate Governance Code, a lower inflation rate than most, and the recent widely publicised visit by Warren Buffett and investments by Berkshire Hathaway, all help the narrative.
JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI) is an international generalist company that seeks to outperform the MSCI All Country World Index (£) courtesy of a high-conviction portfolio of typically 50-90 stocks, while paying a dividend equating to 4 per cent of its NAV each year from capital as required. Portfolio construction is steered by bottom-up stock selection rather than geographical, sector or thematic allocation. Currency exposure is predominantly hedged back towards the benchmark. The company does not pursue a particular investment style, and this allows for flexibility of approach, which it has put to good use when seeking returns – the company having consistently outperformed its benchmark.
Portfolio performance | ||
Growth | Income | |
1 Jan 2009 – 31 Jul 2023 | ||
Portfolio (%) | 376.4 | 260.0 |
Benchmark (%)* | 230.8 | 153.3 |
YTD (to 31 July) | ||
Portfolio (%) | -2.8 | -4.0 |
Benchmark (%)* | 7.0 | 4.1 |
Yield (%) | 3.4 | 4.4 |
*The MSCI PIMFA Growth and Income benchmarks are cited (total return) |